Framing gender identity registration amidst national and international developments: Introduction to ‘Bodies, identities, and gender regimes: Human rights and legal aspects of gender identity registration’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19164/ijgsl.v1i1.971Abstract
Introduction to ‘Bodies, identities, and gender regimes: Human rights and legal aspects of gender identity registration’References
Amelina, A & Lutz, H 2019, Gender and Migration: Transnational and intersectional prospects. Routledge, New York.
Anthias, F 1998, ‘Rethinking social divisions: Some notes towards a theoretical framework’, Sociological Review 46, no. 3, pp. 505-535.
Baars, G 2019, ‘Queer Cases Unmake Gendered Law, Or, Fucking Law’s Gendering Function’, Australian Feminist Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 15-62.
Bennett, T 2015, Cuts and criminality: Body alteration in legal discourse. Routledge, New York.
BMJV (Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz) 2017, Arbeitskreis Abstammungsrecht. Abschlussbericht. Empfehlungen für eine Reform des Abstammungsrechts, Bundesanzeiger Verlag, Köln.
Buschner, A & Bergold, P 2017, ‘Regenbogenfamilien in Deutschland’, in Bergold, P, Buschner, A, Mayer-Lewis, B, Mühling, T (eds.), Familien mit multipler Elternschaft. Entstehungszusammenhänge, Herausforderungen und Potenziale. Verlag Barbara Budrich, Berlin, pp. 143-172.
Butler, J 1993, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex.’ Routledge, New York.
Butler, J 1999, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York.
Butler, J 2004, Undoing Gender. Routledge, New York.
Cho, S, Crenshaw, KW & McCall, L (eds.) 2013, Intersectionality: Theorizing power, empowering theory (special issue), Signs, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 785-1055.
Clarke, J.A. 2015, ‘Identity and Form’, California Law Review, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 747-839.
Clarke, J.A. 2019, ‘They, them, and theirs’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 894-991.
Cooper, D 2019, ‘A very binary drama: The conceptual struggle for gender’s future’, feminists@law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-36.
Cooper, D & Renz, F 2016, ‘If the state decertified gender, what might happen to its meaning and value?’ Journal of Law and Society, vol. 43, pp. 483-505.
Crenshaw, K 1989, ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 1391–1467.
Crenshaw, K 1991, ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,’ Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241-1299.
Davis, DA 2017, ‘The Normativity of Recognition: Non-Binary Gender Markers in Australian Law and Policy’, in Demos, V & Segal, MT (eds.), Gender panic, gender policy: Advances in gender research. Emerald Publishing, Bingley, pp. 227–50.
De Silva, N 2019, ‘Individual and NGO access to the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The latest Blow from Tanzania’ [blog], EJIL Talk, last accessed 9 June 2020, https://www.ejiltalk.org/individual-and-ngo-access-to-the-african-court-on-human-and-peoples-rights-the-latest-blow-from-tanzania/
Erikson, EH 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis. Faber & Faber, London.
FRA: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights 2020, A long way to go for LGBTI equality, EU, Luxembourg, last accessed 10 June 2020, https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2020-lgbti-equality_en.pdf
Franke, K 2015, Wedlocked: The perils of marriage equality. How African Americans and Gays mistakenly thought the right to marry would set them free. New York University Press, New York.
Fredman, S 2016, Intersectional discrimination in EU gender equality and non-discrimination law, European Commission, DG for Justice and Consumers, Directorate D – Equality, Unit JUST/DI, Brussels.
Gamson, J 1995, ‘Must identity movements self-destruct?: A queer dilemma’, Social Problems, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 390-407.
Gerards, J 2018, ‘Margin of appreciation and incrementalism in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 495–515.
Giddens, A 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Grabham, E 2007, ‘Citizen bodies, intersex citizenship.’ Sexualities vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 29-48.
Hines, S 2009, ‘A pathway to diversity?: Human rights, citizenship and the politics of transgender’, Contemporary Politics, vol. 15, no. 1: 87-102.
Holtmaat, R 2004, Towards Different Law and Public Policy The significance of Article 5a CEDAW for the elimination of structural gender discrimination [Research undertaken for the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment in the Netherlands], last accessed 10 June 2020, https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/41992/rikki%20holtmaat%20Towards_Different_Law_and_Public_Policy%20%281%29.pdf?sequence=1
Holzer, L 2018, Non-Binary Gender Registration Models in Europe. Report on third gender marker or no gender marker options. ILGA-Europe, last accessed 13 June 2020, https://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/non-binary_gender_registration_models_in_europe_0.pdf.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights 2017, Opinión Consultiva OC-24/17 de 24 de noviembre de 2017 solicitada por la república de costa rica identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo obligaciones estatales en relación con el cambio de nombre, la identidad de género, y los derechos derivados de un vínculo entre parejas del mismo sexo (interpretación y alcance de los artículos 1.1, 3, 7, 11.2, 13, 17, 18 y 24, en relación con el artículo 1 de la convención americana sobre derechos humanos), last accessed 10 June 2020, http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_24_esp.pdf
International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) 2012, ‘A Review of the Requirement to Display the Holder’s Gender on Travel Documents.’ TAG/MRTD/21-IP/4.
Katyal, SK 2017, ‘The Numerus Clausus of Sex’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 84, pp. 389-494.
Mak, G 2012, Doubting Sex: Inscriptions, Bodies and Selves in the Nineteenth-Century Hermaphrodite Case Histories. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
McLaughlin, J 2006, ‘The Return of the Material’, in Richardson, D, McLaughlin, J, & Casey, ME (eds.), Intersections between feminist and queer theory, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 59-77.
Mezey, SG 2019, Transgender Rights: From Obama to Trump. Routledge, New York.
Molitor V & Zimenkova T 2019, ‘Loyalität, Overperforming und aufgezwungene Expertise: LSBTQ* – Identitäten und Arbeitsalltag in der Polizei’, in Seeliger M, Gruhlich J (eds), Intersektionalität, Arbeit und Organisation. Arbeitsgesellschaft im Wandel. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim.
Monro, S & Van der Ros, J 2018, ‘Trans* and gender variant citizenship and the state in Norway’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 57–78.
Monro S 2019, ‘Non-binary and genderqueer: An overview of the field’, International Journal of Transgenderism, vol. 20, no. 2-3, pp. 126-131.
Nisar, AN 2018, ‘(Un)Becoming a man: Legal consciousness of the third gender category in Pakistan’, Gender and Society, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 59-81.
Otto, D 2015, ‘Queering gender [identity] in international law’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, vol. 33, no. 4, 299–318.
Polizeidienstvorschrift (PDV 300) ‘Ärztliche Beurteilung der Polizeidiensttauglichkeit und der Polizeidienstfähigkeit’ [Police service regulation (PDV 30)’ ‘Medical assessment of the suitability for police service and police service capabilty’], Runderlass des Ministeriums vom 7. 11. 2012 – P 25.41-12 504.1.12 (Nds. MBl. S. 1107)
Quinan, C 2017, ‘Gender (in)securities: Surveillance and transgender Bodies in a post-9/11 era of neoliberalism’, In Leese, M and Wittendorp, S (eds.), Security/Mobility: Politics of Movement. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Quinan, CL & Bresser, N 2020, ‘Gender at the border: Global responses to gender diverse subjectivities and nonbinary registration practices.’ Global Perspectives, forthcoming.
Richardson, D 1998, ‘Sexuality and Citizenship’, Sociology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–100.
Richardson, D 2000, ‘Constructing sexual citizenship: Theorizing sexual rights.’ Critical Social Policy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 105–135.
Richardson, D 2015, ‘Neoliberalism, Citizenship and Activism’, in Paternotte, D, Trembley, M (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Lesbian and Gay Activism, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham.
Sabsay, L 2012, ‘The emergence of the other sexual citizen: orientalism and the modernisation of sexuality’, Citizenship Studies, vol. 16, nos. 1-2, pp. 605-623.
Spade, D 2008, ‘Documenting Gender’, Hastings Law Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 731-842.
Spade, D 2011, Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. South End Press, Brooklyn.
Tajfel, H & Turner, JC 1986, ‘The social identity theory of intergroup behavior’. in Worchel, & Austin, WG (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
van den Brink, M, & Dunne, P 2018, Trans and Intersex Equality Rights in Europe – A Comparative Analysis. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
van den Brink, M, Reuss, P & Tigchelaar, H 2015, ‘Out of the box? domestic and private international law aspects of gender registration: A comparative analysis of Germany and the Netherlands’, European Journal of Law Reform, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 282-293.
van den Brink, M & Tigchelaar, J 2015, M/V en verder. Sekseregistratie door de overheid en de juridische positie van transgenders. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Den Haag.
Verloo, M 2013, ‘Intersectional and Cross-Movement Politics and Policies: Reflections on Current Practices and Debates’, Signs, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 893-915.
Waites, M 2009, ‘Critique of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” in human rights discourse: global queer politics beyond the Yogyakarta Principles’, Contemporary Politics, vol. 15, no. 1: 137-156.
Wipfler, AJ 2016, ‘Identity crisis: The limitations of expanding government recognition of gender identity and the possibility of genderless identity documents’, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, vol. 39, pp. 491-555.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
