Journal of Law, Technology and Trust https://journals.northumbria.ac.uk/index.php/jltt <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em>Journal is not currently accepting submissions<br /><br /></em></strong></span>The Journal of Law, Technology and Trust (JLTT) is a peer reviewed, open access online journal that aims to encourage interdisciplinary and international debate of issues focused upon law, technology and trust and trustworthiness.</p> <p><br />JLTT publishes a range of articles: peer reviewed articles and future-thinking pieces, policy reports and case reviews. The journal embraces both academic debate, and discussion of practical and regulatory issues faced by those in policy and practice.</p> <p>ISSN: 2634-4343</p> <p><a title="https://twitter.com/JournalLTT" href="https://twitter.com/JournalLTT" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Follow us on Twitter for the latest news and developments.</a></p> en-US <p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p><ol start="1"><li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.<br /> </li><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li></ol> marion.oswald@northumbria.ac.uk (Marion Oswald) journals@northumbria.ac.uk (Scholarly Communications Team) Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.2.1.1 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Falling at the First Hurdle? A Critical Analysis of HMCTS’s Implementation of Stage 1 of the Online Court https://journals.northumbria.ac.uk/index.php/jltt/article/view/1156 <p>This article critically examines the progress which has been made to date by HMCTS in implementing Stage 1 of the Online Court. Initially proposed by Lord Briggs as part of the Civil Court Structure Review, Stage 1 was intended to act as a virtual triage system for low value and non-complex civil claims. Its premise was based around a court user completing a series of ‘decision tree’ questions, which would in turn allow the system to provide them with information about the relevant legal framework relating to their dispute and allow them to create a properly pleaded claim or defence for submission to court. This would all be done without the need for legal representation. This article discusses the role Stage 1 is designed to play within the Online Court and the historical policy factors which have combined to render the successful implementation of Stage 1 so critical to the future of access to civil justice and the public trust in accessibility of civil justice. It questions the progress HMCTS have made to date on its design and for comparative purposes discusses the stages involved in the development of the Solutions Explorer within the Civil Resolution Tribunal in British Columbia on which Stage 1 of the Online Court is heavily based. The article concludes by offering recommendations to HMCTS on how the design, development and implementation of Stage 1 can still be achieved successfully.</p> David Sixsmith Copyright (c) 2021 David Sixsmith http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://journals.northumbria.ac.uk/index.php/jltt/article/view/1156 Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000 Customer value theory and cryptocurrency regulation https://journals.northumbria.ac.uk/index.php/jltt/article/view/1215 <p>Cryptocurrencies are the product of disruptive technologies which have the potential to unsettle the global banking sector and, as a result, state-controlled economies across the world. Similarly, their inherent volatility and the relatively unregulated markets within which they are currently traded present a multiplicity of risks from which consumers will increasingly require protection as their popularity continues to rise. In seeking to inform any regulatory intervention, lawmakers are likely to refer to – amongst others – a range of economic, legal, political, sociological, and technological theories to understand the nature and extent of the relevant risks. Customer value theory from the marketing discipline offers an important perspective, which to the authors’ knowledge has not yet been considered. This paper presents the findings of an interdisciplinary, theoretical study, which explored the application of customer value theory to cryptocurrency and its regulation. It is argued that customer value theory offers explanatory insight into the nature of cryptocurrency itself as well as the risks that it poses to consumer traders, and that it thereby constitutes a useful lens for lawmakers as they seek to regulate in this emergent area.</p> Alex Nicholson, Kingsley Udofa, Alannah Collins Copyright (c) 2022 Alex Nicholson, Kingsley Udofa, Alannah Collins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://journals.northumbria.ac.uk/index.php/jltt/article/view/1215 Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0000